1. US President Barack Obama visited Hirosima last May, 71 years after since the atomic bombing for the first time as a present president. This resulted in an outlook by experts that the visit may give a giant impact on the drift of the world diplomacy. Describe for each of the positive and negative impact that the state visit can have on diplomatic current.

The president of the US, President Barack Obama visiting Hiroshima can have by impacts to the international society. This can be positive. On the other hand, it can be negative, too. I think the positive effect of this visit is that it can be a reminder to the people of the world has nuclear bombs can make many people die. And also, it can be a negative effect too, by making people may think that criminals were right.

Predominantly, the positive effect of this visit is that reminding the tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should never happen again. When the second world war was ending, America decided to launch the Manhattan project and make a nuclear bomb. Even though the US and USSR were allies, they didn’t like each other because of their political systems. So, Harry. S. Traman, the president at that time, decided to make a nuclear bomb before USSR could. And that led to thousands of people dying in Japan. The American President visiting Hiroshima can make nuclear weapon-possessing  to think again about the usage of nuclear bombs.

Additionally, the negative effects is that Japanese people can think that the war criminals were right. If they think like that, they will think they should rise again like they did in the early 1940s. Japan does have a strong army even though they were restricted to have a among WWⅡ. If the idea of war rises and effects politics there may be once more a big world war that even more people die.

In conclusion, the visit to Hiroshima by President Barack Obama has both positive and negative effects. But still, I strongly behave that nuclear bombs should not be used ever again.

3. At the ‘2016 International Food Industry Exhibition’ robots or machines working in a food factory were exhibited. While the automation of food spreads out in the general restaurant, Robot “Pepper” of SoftBank  is taking orders from some Asian Pizza Hut Branch and taking charge of payment. With the expansion of the use of artificial intelligence robot as a labor substitute, there are a variety of perspectives on it. Describe both the positive and negative impacts that the labor force of robots can trigger.

Artificial intelligence, AI, is belong a big issue these days. AI can trigger lots of social issues. AI, can do all sorts of things. Labor go company manipulating AI can have lots of positive and negative points. On the other hand, I think the most important positive point is that works done by humans can be done much faster and efficiently. But also, the negative point is that AI can take away human jobs.

First of all, the positive point of AI is that it can do work most efficiently. For example, a highly advanced safer computer can take care of huge means of information. 100 times of human computers can calculate how the world’s economies current will flow, and make new and great inventions. Recently, a robot named Alphago won a game of Baduk. Alphago can be seen as the basic model of AI.

On the other hand, AI can take away human jobs. AI will take away labors. For example, programmed industrial robots will make cars. They will start to construct buildings. These hand  labors are a job what most people do. Brain labor is not safe, also. Huge supercomputers that can deal terabites of information will be selected to manipulated companies they will think what products can be sold more.

In conclusion, AI also influence human society in a lot of ways. This can be either positive or be negative. But, on my thought, I believe people should use this technology in a good way and not use as something dangerous.